Google App Engine Vs Traditional Web Hosting – Which One is Better?

Google App Engine (regularly alluded to as GAE or just App Engine) is a web structure and distributed computing stage for creating and facilitating web applications in Google-oversaw server farms. Applications are sandboxed and kept running over numerous servers. App Engine offers programmed scaling for web applications—as the quantity of solicitations increments for an application, App Engine naturally apportions more assets for the web application to deal with the extra demand. Google app engine is a platform i.e. PaaS item that provides Web application designers and ventures with access to Google’s adaptable facilitating and level 1 Internet administration.

Traditional web hosting, on the other hand, consists of mainly two components i.e. shared facilitating and Committed facilitating. In shared facilitating, you share a server with numerous sites and clients. In committed facilitating, you possess a total server to yourself. It’s basically purchasing a PC and having a facilitating organization oversee it guarantee it keeps awake and running and associated consistently.

Let us now Look at the Comparison between the two: –

  • Website Application- With google app engine you can create your own website without any specific server administration. It has free use of shares and gives adaptability. Google app engine has better access to Google client records and arrangement process is simple. For the creation of custom web-based applications, google app engine is a preferable option as compared to traditional web hosting method. Traditional web hosting as the name suggests is a more structured and dedicated approach with limitations in terms of speed and connectivity. You cannot full control over the server with limited use of only available resources on the server.
  • Web traffic- If not huge, then you could utilize google app engine inside a complementary plan. or then again if traffic would fluctuate, google app engine could take care of that issue since it gives programmed scaling (in the case of relying upon conventional facilitating likely not). In the event that you hope to have consistent traffic than conventional web hosting could be sufficient. When you create and send applications for Google App Engine, as Snapchat or Angry Birds do, you can exploit traffic part to do your A/B testing or dynamic rollout. You can choose to part your client traffic crosswise over multiple variants of your application in the meantime, through an IP address based part rationale, by means of Cookies, or arbitrarily. In the case of traditional web hosting, if the traffic to different sites facilitated on a similar server goes up, the site will back off.
  • Costs- Google App Engine is free up to a particular proportion of benefit use and it definitely is better than traditional web hosting methods due to its pay as per usage policy. There is no administration required on the server as well. Traditional hosting works fine for simple website hosting which uses low-support approach to have a site or application. Most little to medium scale sites utilize traditional web hosting as it is practical and requires low upkeep.
  • Scaling/Web Server- The preferred standpoint of google app engine is that it doesn’t scale. In any case, even after you engage charging, the entire framework is increased to help just 500 solicitations for each second. Google app engine accompanies no/negligible design required on Server as it is a PaaS advertising. Traditional web hosting, on the other hand, you can get full access to customize your web server and introduce any application programming be it Database, OS or any outsider programming.
  • Accessibility: – Google app engine has better access reach to Google client records and arrangement process is simple and has the most noteworthy administrator load. Conveying and re-sending are very quick and it also offers a wide range of services in terms of features from the store, deployment to a newer version is easy. You can utilize a variety of other Google administrations with insignificant reconciliation exertion (Big information, cloud record stockpiling, mailing).
  • Language Integration- Presently, Google App Engine standard condition underpins Java, Python, PHP, Go, and Node.js. Furthermore, your site formats can incorporate JavaScript alongside your HTML which, in addition to other things, enables you to compose AJAX-empowered web applications.
  • Security- Once you have a Google account, Google will squeeze you a bit for increasingly close to home subtleties (Google+) and thereby gather all statistic, online data. Google CSE demonstrates results dependent on Google’s Index of your site. As you probably are aware, Google may not list everything from your site. Along these lines, the CSE results may not demonstrate a specific post or page from your site. This cannot be called a big disadvantage as without local record framework read/compose, it is difficult to process a few information changes with the existing library, and it doesn’t bolster local document framework base library as well. Though, in conventional hosting, a solitary server set up dangers equipment disappointment and downtime for your site and applications.

Final Words

To sum up, choosing from amongst the two would depend on some factors like what kind of website/traffic are you looking at, an efficiency of the search engine, the kind of money involved, platforms being used, and auto-scaling.